Lenz Fool

Bill McKibben writes in the Washington Post that trying to engage the fossil fuel industry is a “fool’s errand”.

He points to recent comments by Rex Tillerson, citing them as proof that is it makes no sense talking to the enemy.

In contrast, my Phaseout Profit Theory is pointing out that having caps on oil sales is in the interest of oil companies.

If true, the rational thing for Exxon would be to fire Tillerson and join Bill McKibben’s 350.org campaign.

That in turn would strongly speed up enacting climate legislation.

To have that happen, two conditions need to be true.

For one, Phaseout Profit Theory needs to be correct in the first place. I may be wrong, but I still have to hear a convincing argument against it.

And in the second place, someone needs to explain this to the fossil fuel companies. That means engaging them.

It may be a fool’s errand, but the potential payoff is rather huge.

Published by kflenz

Professor at Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyo. Author of Lenz Blog (since 2003, lenzblog.com).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: