Craig Morris writes another long debunking article pointing out some mistakes in something Vaclav Smil wrote about the German Energiewende.
Morris points out more than five errors. But there is also is this extraordinary claim by Smil:
The levelized cost of German photovoltaic electricity is easily four times that of coal-based generation.
Let’s do some fact-checking.
Right now, the feed-in tariffs for solar are between 9.16 and 13.05 cents Euro (since today, depending on the size of the project).
Since Smil wrote “easily”, we’ll take the lower figure (9.16) and divide that by four to get 2.29 cents for coal-based generation in Smil’s alternative universe.
In reality, the latest study quoted at the relevant German Wikipedia page gives cost for new coal between 6.3 and 8.0 cents.
This is important. The biggest success of the German feed-in tariff system was to bring prices down. Which will help deploying solar faster everywhere.
The basic premise of Smil’s article is wrong as well. Of course opponents of the transition to renewable energy in Germany like the INSM losers have noticed this and tried to make hay from this particular talking point.
The only way to avoid this problem with a feed-in tariff would be to approve lower surcharges for low income households, as there are already exceptions for industry and railways.
But that would make the system even more complicated, which is really not warranted for the couple of Euro a month the average household actually pays in surcharge costs.
The last time I wrote about Smil here was under the headline “Smil mistake“, pointing out a simple error in one of his books. This is another one.